Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: UncleBruce Date: Oct 4, 2011 9:30am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Weir or Healy??

So still not clear, was it Weir telling Healy when to do the effect or Healy just doing it when he felt like it or a bit of both? If Healy did effects that they did not like, around when and what were they? maybe I am being to specific but I think the effect is such a part of Bobby being Bobby that I am curious to who produced it.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: leftwinger57 Date: Oct 4, 2011 12:24pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Weir or Healy??

To me I just can't wrap my head around that the sound guy Healy held court over the guys in the band and specifically Bobby.For the most part by now these are well rehearsed tunes and one would think that settings were pretty much finalize during sound checks.Also when you have a band's consensous that it's not good he would have mix it to their likeing. The story about Healy treating opening acts who were using the Dead's sound like shit were true and his lame reasoning was that the Dead deserved the most optimal sound and if that meant the opener being turned down or muddy sounding so be it. This never should of happened, the days of real shit p.a. systems are long gone.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: sambonk2 Date: Oct 4, 2011 10:55am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Weir or Healy??

Dan was in charge of the Effects Proccessors front of house.He was one putting thunder/verb/ and so on,to all the stuff...